* initial version of event relationship MSC
* fix MSC numbers
* clarifications
* mention multiple relations per event might be useful, but postpone for a future MSC
* mention MSC 3051 for proposed multiple relations
* remove send_relation endpoint
* move e2ee section under sending relations
* mention limitation of leaving server-side aggregations out for now
* remove mentions of m.reference, we'll sort that out in another MSC
* whitespace
* argument why m.relates_to should be preserved by redactions more general
but still give example of redacted edits
* deal with this in the comments
* clarify the conditions to meet for a relation
* mention specifically that this does not replace replies (yet)
* clarify how general rel_types should be
* clarify that gaps may cause clients to be unaware of some relations
* Update proposals/2674-event-relationships.md
Co-authored-by: DeepBlueV7.X <nicolas.werner@hotmail.de>
* Update proposals/2674-event-relationships.md
Co-authored-by: DeepBlueV7.X <nicolas.werner@hotmail.de>
* make wording clearer and move to bottom of section
* remove this as references are not defined here anymore
* clearer wording
* move edge cases to other relevant mscs
* clarify that a goal of sticking to this format is backwards compat.
* mention MSC 3267, to which m.reference has been extracted
* Update proposals/2674-event-relationships.md
Co-authored-by: Hubert Chathi <hubert@uhoreg.ca>
* Update proposals/2674-event-relationships.md
Co-authored-by: Hubert Chathi <hubert@uhoreg.ca>
* Update proposals/2674-event-relationships.md
Co-authored-by: Matthew Hodgson <matthew@arasphere.net>
* Update proposals/2674-event-relationships.md
Co-authored-by: Matthew Hodgson <matthew@arasphere.net>
* Update proposals/2674-event-relationships.md
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
* wrap lines
* better wording
* this is singular, really
* add example of event shape
* specify how invalid relations should be treated by the redaction algorithm
* fix typo
* split up redactions changes in separate MSC
* also add new msc to introduction
* reword why not adopt m.in_reply_to
* remove guidelines how to pick rel_type
* mention that the target event must exist in the same room
* spell out the conscious (subject, object, verb) triple idea.
* Spelling
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* remove paragraph saying what server should accept
* Revert "remove paragraph saying what server should accept"
This reverts commit e0271331b2.
* further specify that a server should reject invalid relations through the cs api
* linebreak
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Windels <bruno@windels.cloud>
Co-authored-by: DeepBlueV7.X <nicolas.werner@hotmail.de>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Hodgson <matthew@arasphere.net>
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
9654bf19b3
