matrix-doc/specification/rooms/v1.rst

362 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. Copyright 2018 New Vector Ltd
..
.. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
.. you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
.. You may obtain a copy of the License at
..
.. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
..
.. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
.. distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
.. WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
.. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
.. limitations under the License.
.. Note: This document appended to the end of the intro, so this next line
.. appears under "Other Room Versions".
This is the specification for **room version 1** (``"1"``).
Changelog
---------
.. topic:: Room version 1
{{rooms_changelog_v1}}
This version of the specification is generated from
`matrix-doc <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc>`_ as of Git commit
`{{git_version}} <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/tree/{{git_rev}}>`_.
For the full historical changelog, see
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/blob/master/changelogs/rooms.rst
Room IDs and Event IDs
----------------------
A room has exactly one room ID. A room ID has the format::
!opaque_id:domain
An event has exactly one event ID. An event ID has the format::
$opaque_id:domain
The ``domain`` of a room/event ID is the `server name`_ of the homeserver which
created the room/event. The domain is used only for namespacing to avoid the
risk of clashes of identifiers between different homeservers. There is no
implication that the room or event in question is still available at the
corresponding homeserver.
Event IDs and Room IDs are case-sensitive. They are not meant to be human
readable.
.. TODO-spec
What is the grammar for the opaque part? https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SPEC-389
.. _`server name`: ../appendices.html#server-name
Event schema
------------
All communication in Matrix is expressed in the form of data objects called
Events. These are the fundamental building blocks common to the client-server,
server-server and application-service APIs, and are described below.
Note that the structure of these events may be different than those in the
server-server API.
{{common_event_fields}}
{{common_room_event_fields}}
{{common_state_event_fields}}
Size limits
-----------
The complete event MUST NOT be larger than 65535 bytes, when formatted as a
`PDU for the Server-Server protocol <../server_server/%SERVER_RELEASE_LABEL%#pdus>`_,
including any signatures, and encoded as `Canonical JSON`_.
There are additional restrictions on sizes per key:
- ``sender`` MUST NOT exceed 255 bytes (including domain).
- ``room_id`` MUST NOT exceed 255 bytes.
- ``state_key`` MUST NOT exceed 255 bytes.
- ``type`` MUST NOT exceed 255 bytes.
- ``event_id`` MUST NOT exceed 255 bytes.
Some event types have additional size restrictions which are specified in
the description of the event. Additional keys have no limit other than that
implied by the total 65 KB limit on events.
Server implementation components
--------------------------------
.. WARNING::
The information contained in this section is strictly for server implementors.
Applications which use the Client-Server API are generally unaffected by the
details contained here, and can safely ignore their presence.
The algorithms defined here should only apply to version 1 rooms. Other algorithms
may be used by other room versions, and as such servers should be aware of which
version room they are dealing with prior to executing a given algorithm.
.. WARNING::
Although room version 1 is the most popular room version, it is known to have
undesirable effects. Servers implementing support for room version 1 should be
aware that restrictions should be generally relaxed and be aware that inconsistencies
may occur until room version 2 is ready and adopted.
State resolution
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. WARNING::
This section documents the state resolution algorithm as implemented by
Synapse as of December 2017 (and therefore the de-facto Matrix protocol).
However, this algorithm is known to have some problems.
The room state :math:`S'(E)` after an event :math:`E` is defined in terms of
the room state :math:`S(E)` before :math:`E`, and depends on whether
:math:`E` is a state event or a message event:
* If :math:`E` is a message event, then :math:`S'(E) = S(E)`.
* If :math:`E` is a state event, then :math:`S'(E)` is :math:`S(E)`, except
that its entry corresponding to :math:`E`'s ``event_type`` and ``state_key``
is replaced by :math:`E`'s ``event_id``.
The room state :math:`S(E)` before :math:`E` is the *resolution* of the set of
states :math:`\{ S'(E'), S'(E''), … \}` consisting of the states after each of
:math:`E`'s ``prev_event``\s :math:`\{ E', E'', … \}`.
The *resolution* of a set of states is defined as follows. The resolved state
is built up in a number of passes; here we use :math:`R` to refer to the
results of the resolution so far.
* Start by setting :math:`R` to the union of the states to be resolved,
excluding any *conflicting* events.
* First we resolve conflicts between ``m.room.power_levels`` events. If there
is no conflict, this step is skipped, otherwise:
* Assemble all the ``m.room.power_levels`` events from the states to
be resolved into a list.
* Sort the list by ascending ``depth`` then descending ``sha1(event_id)``.
* Add the first event in the list to :math:`R`.
* For each subsequent event in the list, check that the event would be
allowed by the `authorization rules`_ for a room in state :math:`R`. If the
event would be allowed, then update :math:`R` with the event and continue
with the next event in the list. If it would not be allowed, stop and
continue below with ``m.room.join_rules`` events.
* Repeat the above process for conflicts between ``m.room.join_rules`` events.
* Repeat the above process for conflicts between ``m.room.member`` events.
* No other events affect the authorization rules, so for all other conflicts,
just pick the event with the highest depth and lowest ``sha1(event_id)`` that
passes authentication in :math:`R` and add it to :math:`R`.
A *conflict* occurs between states where those states have different
``event_ids`` for the same ``(state_type, state_key)``. The events thus
affected are said to be *conflicting* events.
Authorisation rules
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The rules governing whether an event is authorized depend solely on the
state of the room at the point in the room graph at which the new event is to
be inserted. The types of state events that affect authorization are:
- ``m.room.create``
- ``m.room.member``
- ``m.room.join_rules``
- ``m.room.power_levels``
- ``m.room.third_party_invite``
The rules are as follows:
1. If type is ``m.room.create``:
a. If it has any previous events, reject.
b. If the domain of the ``room_id`` does not match the domain of the
``sender``, reject.
c. If ``content.room_version`` is present and is not a recognised version,
reject.
d. If ``content`` has no ``creator`` field, reject.
e. Otherwise, allow.
#. Reject if event has ``auth_events`` that:
a. have duplicate entries for a given ``type`` and ``state_key`` pair
#. have entries whose ``type`` and ``state_key`` don't match those
specified by the `auth events selection`_ algorithm described above.
#. If event does not have a ``m.room.create`` in its ``auth_events``, reject.
#. If type is ``m.room.aliases``:
a. If event has no ``state_key``, reject.
b. If sender's domain doesn't matches ``state_key``, reject.
c. Otherwise, allow.
#. If type is ``m.room.member``:
a. If no ``state_key`` key or ``membership`` key in ``content``, reject.
#. If ``membership`` is ``join``:
i. If the only previous event is an ``m.room.create``
and the ``state_key`` is the creator, allow.
#. If the ``sender`` does not match ``state_key``, reject.
#. If the ``sender`` is banned, reject.
#. If the ``join_rule`` is ``invite`` then allow if membership state
is ``invite`` or ``join``.
#. If the ``join_rule`` is ``public``, allow.
#. Otherwise, reject.
#. If ``membership`` is ``invite``:
i. If ``content`` has ``third_party_invite`` key:
#. If *target user* is banned, reject.
#. If ``content.third_party_invite`` does not have a
``signed`` key, reject.
#. If ``signed`` does not have ``mxid`` and ``token`` keys, reject.
#. If ``mxid`` does not match ``state_key``, reject.
#. If there is no ``m.room.third_party_invite`` event in the
current room state with ``state_key`` matching ``token``, reject.
#. If ``sender`` does not match ``sender`` of the
``m.room.third_party_invite``, reject.
#. If any signature in ``signed`` matches any public key in the
``m.room.third_party_invite`` event, allow. The public keys are
in ``content`` of ``m.room.third_party_invite`` as:
#. A single public key in the ``public_key`` field.
#. A list of public keys in the ``public_keys`` field.
#. Otherwise, reject.
#. If the ``sender``'s current membership state is not ``join``, reject.
#. If *target user*'s current membership state is ``join`` or ``ban``,
reject.
#. If the ``sender``'s power level is greater than or equal to the *invite
level*, allow.
#. Otherwise, reject.
#. If ``membership`` is ``leave``:
i. If the ``sender`` matches ``state_key``, allow if and only if that user's
current membership state is ``invite`` or ``join``.
#. If the ``sender``'s current membership state is not ``join``, reject.
#. If the *target user*'s current membership state is ``ban``, and the
``sender``'s power level is less than the *ban level*, reject.
#. If the ``sender``'s power level is greater than or equal to the *kick
level*, and the *target user*'s power level is less than the
``sender``'s power level, allow.
#. Otherwise, reject.
#. If ``membership`` is ``ban``:
i. If the ``sender``'s current membership state is not ``join``, reject.
#. If the ``sender``'s power level is greater than or equal to the *ban
level*, and the *target user*'s power level is less than the
``sender``'s power level, allow.
#. Otherwise, reject.
#. Otherwise, the membership is unknown. Reject.
#. If the ``sender``'s current membership state is not ``join``, reject.
#. If type is ``m.room.third_party_invite``:
a. Allow if and only if ``sender``'s current power level is greater than
or equal to the *invite level*.
#. If the event type's *required power level* is greater than the ``sender``'s power
level, reject.
#. If the event has a ``state_key`` that starts with an ``@`` and does not match
the ``sender``, reject.
#. If type is ``m.room.power_levels``:
a. If ``users`` key in ``content`` is not a dictionary with keys that are
valid user IDs with values that are integers (or a string that is an
integer), reject.
#. If there is no previous ``m.room.power_levels`` event in the room, allow.
#. For each of the keys ``users_default``, ``events_default``,
``state_default``, ``ban``, ``redact``, ``kick``, ``invite``, as well as
each entry being changed under the ``events`` or ``users`` keys:
i. If the current value is higher than the ``sender``'s current power level,
reject.
#. If the new value is higher than the ``sender``'s current power level,
reject.
#. For each entry being changed under the ``users`` key, other than the
``sender``'s own entry:
i. If the current value is equal to the ``sender``'s current power level,
reject.
#. Otherwise, allow.
#. If type is ``m.room.redaction``:
a. If the ``sender``'s power level is greater than or equal to the *redact
level*, allow.
#. If the domain of the ``event_id`` of the event being redacted is the same
as the domain of the ``event_id`` of the ``m.room.redaction``, allow.
#. Otherwise, reject.
#. Otherwise, allow.
.. NOTE::
Some consequences of these rules:
* Unless you are a member of the room, the only permitted operations (apart
from the intial create/join) are: joining a public room; accepting or
rejecting an invitation to a room.
* To unban somebody, you must have power level greater than or equal to both
the kick *and* ban levels, *and* greater than the target user's power
level.