44 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
44 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
summary: Ability for users or admins to send arbitrary IRC commands through the IRC AS
|
|
---
|
|
created: 2015-04-23 16:54:02.0
|
|
creator: matthew
|
|
description: ''
|
|
id: '11361'
|
|
key: BOTS-27
|
|
number: '27'
|
|
priority: '2'
|
|
project: '10101'
|
|
reporter: matthew
|
|
resolution: '1'
|
|
resolutiondate: 2016-06-02 10:35:37.0
|
|
status: '5'
|
|
type: '2'
|
|
updated: 2016-06-02 10:35:37.0
|
|
votes: '0'
|
|
watches: '3'
|
|
workflowId: '11461'
|
|
---
|
|
actions:
|
|
- author: illicitonion
|
|
body: |-
|
|
I'm not convinced we want this functionality (though I'm also not convinced that we don't).
|
|
|
|
In general, I would rather provide an equal baseline for all clients/bridges, and force us to actually represent any meaningful command in the actual Matrix spec, rather than breaking our abstraction layers. I don't like, for instance, the idea of some IRC users using DCC file transfer which wouldn't at all work for non-IRC users, when we have a file transfer spec.
|
|
|
|
Anyone want to have a discussion?
|
|
created: 2016-01-05 13:09:45.0
|
|
id: '12504'
|
|
issue: '11361'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: illicitonion
|
|
updated: 2016-01-05 13:09:45.0
|
|
- author: kegan
|
|
body: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-irc/issues/49
|
|
created: 2016-06-02 10:35:37.0
|
|
id: '12958'
|
|
issue: '11361'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: kegan
|
|
updated: 2016-06-02 10:35:37.0
|