59 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
59 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
summary: How to deal with large rooms.
|
|
---
|
|
created: 2014-10-01 10:42:32.0
|
|
creator: erikj
|
|
description: |-
|
|
For every user in the room we currently have a dedicated state event for them. For large rooms with many 1000s or more members this becomes less than ideal due to the overhead for both clients and servers.
|
|
|
|
The protocol itself only requires knowledge of which servers are in the room.
|
|
id: '10435'
|
|
key: SPEC-36
|
|
number: '36'
|
|
priority: '3'
|
|
project: '10001'
|
|
reporter: erikj
|
|
status: '1'
|
|
type: '1'
|
|
updated: 2016-10-28 16:26:46.0
|
|
votes: '0'
|
|
watches: '3'
|
|
workflowId: '10539'
|
|
---
|
|
actions:
|
|
- author: markjh
|
|
body: |-
|
|
For rooms that have a large number of participants split over a small number of servers we can use the existing full mesh protocol by distributing a list of member servers using membership PDUs for a participant on each server to prove that it should be in the list.
|
|
|
|
For rooms with a large number of participating servers we might need to look at new protocols for distributing the messages without each server needing to know the full list.
|
|
created: 2014-10-01 10:54:25.0
|
|
id: '10496'
|
|
issue: '10435'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: markjh
|
|
updated: 2014-10-01 10:54:25.0
|
|
- author: richvdh
|
|
body: Is this bug about alternatives to full-mesh routing, or about reducing the number of state events flying around?
|
|
created: 2015-12-01 15:51:32.0
|
|
id: '12399'
|
|
issue: '10435'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: richvdh
|
|
updated: 2015-12-01 15:51:32.0
|
|
- author: richvdh
|
|
body: full-mesh alternatives seems to be SPEC-45, so I assume it's the latter? is this a real problem?
|
|
created: 2015-12-01 16:02:54.0
|
|
id: '12401'
|
|
issue: '10435'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: richvdh
|
|
updated: 2015-12-01 16:02:54.0
|
|
- author: richvdh
|
|
body: 'Migrated to github: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/467'
|
|
created: 2016-10-28 16:26:46.0
|
|
id: '13242'
|
|
issue: '10435'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: richvdh
|
|
updated: 2016-10-28 16:26:46.0
|