matrix.org/static/jira/browse/SPEC-367

54 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

---
summary: m.presence claims it should have a content.user_id, which appears to be a lie
---
created: 2016-03-17 13:46:26.0
creator: neb
description: Submitted by @matthew:matrix.org
id: '12563'
key: SPEC-367
number: '367'
priority: '2'
project: '10001'
reporter: neb
status: '1'
type: '1'
updated: 2016-10-28 16:28:23.0
votes: '0'
watches: '2'
workflowId: '12663'
---
actions:
- author: richvdh
body: |-
Empirically they don't have a {{content.user_id}}; they have a {{sender}}:
{noformat}
{
content: {presence: "online", last_active_ago: 570, currently_active: true},
sender: "@richvdh:matrix.org",
type: "m.presence"
}
{noformat}
created: 2016-06-29 11:58:34.0
id: '13033'
issue: '12563'
type: comment
updateauthor: richvdh
updated: 2016-06-29 11:59:14.0
- author: richvdh
body: could be a difference between events received via {{/events}} and those received via {{/sync}}? In which case we should doc the new format and note it in the [migration guide|http://matrix.org/docs/guides/client-server-migrating-from-v1.html]
created: 2016-06-29 12:01:05.0
id: '13034'
issue: '12563'
type: comment
updateauthor: richvdh
updated: 2016-06-29 12:01:05.0
- author: richvdh
body: 'Migrated to github: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/650'
created: 2016-10-28 16:28:23.0
id: '13459'
issue: '12563'
type: comment
updateauthor: richvdh
updated: 2016-10-28 16:28:23.0