67 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
67 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
summary: Allow people to redact their own messages.
|
|
---
|
|
assignee: illicitonion
|
|
created: 2015-01-21 16:02:27.0
|
|
creator: erikj
|
|
description: ''
|
|
id: '10971'
|
|
key: SYN-248
|
|
number: '248'
|
|
priority: '2'
|
|
project: '10000'
|
|
reporter: erikj
|
|
resolution: '1'
|
|
resolutiondate: 2016-01-06 02:33:02.0
|
|
status: '5'
|
|
type: '2'
|
|
updated: 2016-01-06 02:33:02.0
|
|
votes: '0'
|
|
watches: '2'
|
|
workflowId: '11071'
|
|
---
|
|
actions:
|
|
- author: erikj
|
|
body: This could be a per room option?
|
|
created: 2015-01-21 16:02:38.0
|
|
id: '11176'
|
|
issue: '10971'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: erikj
|
|
updated: 2015-01-21 16:02:38.0
|
|
- author: erikj
|
|
body: |-
|
|
My reservation with allowing this is that it may encourage HS's and clients to ignore redactions, thus decreasing their usefulness in other cases.
|
|
|
|
Perhaps this should be done via moderation features? Or as a separate feature?
|
|
created: 2015-05-07 11:46:26.0
|
|
id: '11721'
|
|
issue: '10971'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: erikj
|
|
updated: 2015-05-07 11:46:26.0
|
|
- author: matthew
|
|
body: I don't buy the idea that this encourages HS or clients to ignore redactions. Letting users redact their own verbiage is just polite, imo.
|
|
created: 2015-06-29 23:57:41.0
|
|
id: '11942'
|
|
issue: '10971'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: matthew
|
|
updated: 2015-06-29 23:57:41.0
|
|
- author: matthew
|
|
body: Also, if we let users in future edit their own messages (for s/foo/bar/ style alterations), i suspect we should let them redact them too.
|
|
created: 2015-06-29 23:59:21.0
|
|
id: '11943'
|
|
issue: '10971'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: matthew
|
|
updated: 2015-06-29 23:59:21.0
|
|
- author: matthew
|
|
body: this happened.
|
|
created: 2016-01-06 02:33:02.0
|
|
id: '12520'
|
|
issue: '10971'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: matthew
|
|
updated: 2016-01-06 02:33:02.0
|