45 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
45 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
summary: SEO for content on matrix public channels
|
|
---
|
|
assignee: matthew
|
|
created: 2015-02-16 01:35:53.0
|
|
creator: matthew
|
|
description: |-
|
|
I'd like Google to be able to index public matrix rooms easily (unless people flag them as do-not-index) - this makes the valuable information in scrollback much more accessible, and makes it feel more like a mailing list substitute. From a marketing-Matrix perspective this is fairly important.
|
|
|
|
This requires:
|
|
* Defining do-not-index state for a room, and honouring it with robots.txt or user-agent analysis or similar
|
|
* Supporting anonymous accounts
|
|
* Ensuring that page contents is navigable and paginatable (might involve turning off angular if we detect a search engine user agent)
|
|
* Ideally we'd also expose per-message URIs to make content more findable, too.
|
|
id: '11062'
|
|
key: SYWEB-283
|
|
number: '283'
|
|
priority: '2'
|
|
project: '10004'
|
|
reporter: matthew
|
|
status: '10100'
|
|
type: '2'
|
|
updated: 2015-09-22 22:47:10.0
|
|
votes: '1'
|
|
watches: '3'
|
|
workflowId: '11162'
|
|
---
|
|
actions:
|
|
- author: kegan
|
|
body: We would need to make public channels read-only without an {{access_token}}. I was under the impression we thought about this and decided against it?
|
|
created: 2015-02-16 12:56:17.0
|
|
id: '11263'
|
|
issue: '11062'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: kegan
|
|
updated: 2015-02-16 12:56:17.0
|
|
- author: matthew
|
|
body: I don't remember us deciding against it - meanwhile, we're seeing more requests for read-only clients (e.g. from randy@vuc, and si-m1). At least being able to support anonymous sign-in with read-only semantics for public rooms feels like a really useful thing to be able to do.
|
|
created: 2015-03-23 17:22:24.0
|
|
id: '11428'
|
|
issue: '11062'
|
|
type: comment
|
|
updateauthor: matthew
|
|
updated: 2015-03-23 17:22:24.0
|