3.4 KiB
(mlcs)= (component-providers)=
Component providers
Authors of Pulumi programs can use component resources to logically group related resources together. For instance, a TypeScript program might specify a component that combines AWS and PostgreSQL providers to abstract the management of an RDS database and logical databases within it:
import * as aws from "@pulumi/aws"
import * as postgresql from "@pulumi/postgresql"
class Database extends pulumi.ComponentResource {
constructor(name: string, args: DatabaseArgs, opts?: pulumi.ComponentResourceOptions) {
super("my:database:Database", name, args, opts)
const rds = new aws.rds.Instance("my-rds", { ... }, { parent: this })
const pg = new postgresql.Database("my-db", { ... }, { parent: this })
...
}
}
This component can then be used just like any other Pulumi resource:
const db = new Database("my-db", { ... })
...if the program is written in the same language as the component (in this case, TypeScript). In some cases however it would be great if components could be reused in multiple languages, since components provide a natural means to abstract and reuse infrastructure.
Enter component providers (also known as multi-language components, or MLCs). Component providers allow components to be written in one language and used in another (or rather, any other). Typically we refer to such components as remote, in contrast with local components written directly in and alongside the user's program as above.
Under the hood, component providers expose remote components by implementing the
method. The engine automatically calls
Construct
when it sees a request to create a remote
component.1 Indeed, since providers and gRPC calls are the key
to making custom resources consumable in any language, exposing components
through the same interface is a natural extension of the Pulumi model.
Just as the body of a component resource is largely concerned with instantiating
other resources, so is the implementation of Construct
for a component
provider. Whereas a custom resource's
method can be expected to make a "raw" call to some underlying cloud provider
API (for instance), is generally only
concerned with registering child resources and their desired state. For this
reason, includes a monitorEndpoint
so that the
component provider can itself make
calls back to the deployment's
resource monitor to register these child resources. Child
resources registered by Construct
consequently end up in the calling program's
state just like any other resource, and proceed through step
generation, etc. in exactly the same way. That is to say, once
Construct
has been called, the engine does not really care whether or not a
resource registration came from the program or a remote component.
:::{note} "Ordinary" resource providers and component providers are not mutually exclusive -- it is perfectly sensible for a provider to implement both the and //... methods. :::
-
See resource registration for more information. ↩︎