8.9 KiB
MSC4013: Poll history cache
The purpose of this MSC is to allow clients to quickly fetch all the polls in a given room (aka “Poll history”).
Problem
Clients sometimes may want to access quickly to all the polls sent in a given room (similarly to how they may want to
access all the media being sent in a room).Today clients don’t have an efficient way to make such an operation.
Clients that want to implement this feature for encrypted rooms on the status quo may need to backward paginate on the
room’s timeline until all the polls are found or they reach the beginning of the timeline. For unencrypted rooms the
problem doesn't exist since clients can call the
messages API
filtering by event type (e.g. by m.poll.start
).
Proposal
Introduce a new state event m.room.poll_history
. This state event is supposed to be referenced by any m.poll.start
that will be sent next in the room. The new state event must have an empty string as state_key
.
More information on polls can be found on the MSC3381.
This is how the new state event would look like:
{
// irrelevant fields not shown
"content": {},
"state_key": "",
"type": "m.room.poll_history",
"event_id": "poll_history_id"
}
Dependencies
Client behaviour
First of all a room creator sends the new m.room.poll_history
state event in the initial_state
when calling the
createRoom API.
For example the body when creating a new encrypted room would look like this:
{
"preset": "private_chat",
"name": "Some room",
"is_direct": false,
"initial_state": [
// ... other state events
{
"stateKey": "",
"type": "m.room.encryption",
"content": {
"algorithm": "m.megolm.v1.aes-sha2"
}
},
{
"stateKey": "",
"type": "m.room.poll_history",
"content": {}
}
]
}
Any time a client starts a new poll, it also includes a reference to the above state event id like this:
{
"type": "m.poll.start",
// irrelevant fields not shown
"content": {
"m.poll.start": {
"kind": "m.poll.disclosed",
"answers": [
{"id": "id_a", "m.text": "Yes"},
{"id": "id_b", "m.text": "No"}
],
"question": { "m.text": "Do you like polls?" },
"max_selections": 1,
},
// reference to the state event of type "m.room.poll_history"
"m.relates_to": {
"event_id": "poll_history_id",
"rel_type": "m.reference"
}
}
}
Clients can now use the event relationship to fetch the history of polls in the room:
-
They call the relations API with the new state event’s event identifier (
poll_history_id
in the example). Since the API takes a timeline direction and a pagination token, clients still have the flexibility to decide how many polls they want to fetch in a given room and in which direction.The request would look like this:
/_matrix/client/v1/rooms/{Room ID}/relations/poll_history_id/m.reference?from=from_token&dir=b&limit=100
The response will contain an array of related event identifiers. In encrypted rooms these events have likely the type
m.room.encrypted
. After the decryption clients should keep just decrypted events of typem.poll.start
. -
For each event
id_some
kept from the previous step, clients need to make the poll aggregation either by fetching data from a local database (if available) or by calling again the relations API again with theid_some
event id. At this point clients have all the information they need to build the full poll history.
Potential issues
History on already existing rooms
It’s desirable to have the new m.room.poll_history
state as a part of the initial_state
of a room, but sometimes
people may want to have a similar behaviour on already existing rooms. In this case a user with enough power level can
just publish a m.room.poll_history
event in the room. It is worth noticing that in this cases m.poll.start
events
sent before wouldn't have any relationship with the state event.
Rooms with both old and new clients
Clients understanding the new m.room.poll_history
state event should still not fetch the poll history as described
above if the m.room.poll_history
is missing in a room. It's still possible however to have old and new clients in a
room supporting the poll history. In this case new clients wouldn't see new polls opened by old clients in the poll
history. This problem doesn't affect the room's timeline.
Privacy
Even in encrypted rooms references to other events (key m.relates_to
) are clear text. With this proposal, starting a
poll in an encrypted room means sending an event of type m.room.encrypted
having a reference to the state event id of
type m.room.poll_history
. Since state events are also clear text, people may infer that the actual content of the
encrypted message is actually a started poll (although its content is still encrypted).
Power levels considerations
The new m.room.poll_history
event isn’t supposed to change over time. For this reason the power level required to
change the m.room.poll_history
event should be as high as the the one required for changing the state event
m.room.power_levels
(or similar).
Possible extensions
The problem this MSC is trying to fix here is to build an index for events of a given type (m.poll.start
in this case).
In theory this approach can be useful to group other events together (e.g. images) with the purpose to show them
together on clients. To fix this problem we can think of a more generic state event type m.room.history
and use the
state_key
to differentiate several types of events.
For polls the state event would look like this:
{
// irrelevant fields not shown
"content": {},
"state_key": "m.poll.start",
"type": "m.room.history",
"event_id": "poll_history_id"
}
Alternatives considered
State event for each poll
An alternative can be to have multiple instances of the same state event m.room.poll_history
but with different
state_key
s. In this case the client opening a poll is also required to send a state event with the state_key
equal
to @sender:somewhere.org_XYZ
. The string XYZ
should be a unique token for the poll. The perfect candidate is the
event id of the m.poll.start
event.
The poll history can later be built by fetching all the state events with type m.room.poll_history
by calling the
state API.
This is possible since here the state event also contains the event id of the m.poll.start
event:
{
// irrelevant fields not shown
"content": {
// the id of the `m.poll.start` event
"poll_id": "poll started event id"
},
// Potentially XYZ == the id of the `m.poll.start` event
"state_key": "@someone:somewhere.org_XYZ",
"type": "m.room.poll_history",
"event_id": "poll_history_id"
}
Potential problems with this approach however are:
- Users opening a poll need enough power level to send a state event (
m.room.poll_history
) - This approach has an additional dependency: MSC3757
State event containing an array of poll started events
The idea here is to introduce new state event as the main proposal. The only difference is that here clients are
supposed to update the state event every time they open a new poll. The new state event's purpose is to contain all the
ids for m.poll.start
events.
The new state event would look like this:
{
// irrelevant fields not shown
"content": {
"polls": [
"poll_started_a_id",
"poll_started_b_id",
]
},
"state_key": "",
"type": "m.room.poll_history",
"event_id": "poll_history_id"
}
Potential problems with this approach are:
- Users opening a poll need enough power level to send a state event (
m.room.poll_history
) - Conflicts may arise when two users attempt to change the state event at the same time
- A malicious user or a bug in a client may accidentally erase the history sending a wrong payload
Unstable prefix
While this MSC is not considered stable, implementations should use org.matrix.msc4013.*
as a prefix in place of
m.*
for the new state event type.