57 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
57 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
# MSC2263: Give homeservers the ability to handle their own 3PID registrations/password resets
|
|
|
|
In order to better protect the privacy of a user, Matrix is wanting to shift to
|
|
a model where identity servers have less control over the affairs of the homeserver.
|
|
Identity servers are currently used to reset the passwords of users on a given homeserver
|
|
as an identity verification technique, however there is no reason why the homeserver
|
|
itself can't handle the verification. This proposal allows for a homeserver to verify
|
|
the identity of users itself, without the use of an identity server.
|
|
|
|
## Proposal
|
|
|
|
The `id_server` parameter is to become optional on the following endpoints:
|
|
|
|
* `/_matrix/client/:version/account/3pid/:medium/requestToken`
|
|
* `/_matrix/client/:version/register/:medium/requestToken`
|
|
* `/_matrix/client/:version/account/password/:medium/requestToken`
|
|
|
|
The `id_server` parameter is additionally deprecated with intention of being removed
|
|
in a future specification release on the `/register/:medium` and `/account/password/:medium`
|
|
endpoints. Once appropriate adoption has been achieved, the specification can safely
|
|
remove the parameter as supported. The reason for this deprecation is to completely
|
|
remove the identity server's ability to be involved in password resets/registration.
|
|
Users wishing to bind their 3rd party identifiers can do so after registration, and
|
|
clients can automate this if they so desire.
|
|
|
|
Note that `bind_email` and `bind_msisdn` on `/register` have already been removed
|
|
by [MSC2140](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2140).
|
|
|
|
As per [MSC2140](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2140), an `id_access_token`
|
|
is required only if an `id_server` is supplied.
|
|
|
|
Although not specified as required in the specification currently, the `id_server`
|
|
as part of User-Interactive Authentication is also optional if this proposal is accepted.
|
|
When the client requests a token without an `id_server`, it should not specify an
|
|
`id_server` in UIA.
|
|
|
|
Homeservers can reuse HTTP 400 `M_SERVER_NOT_TRUSTED` as an error code on the `/requestToken`
|
|
endpoints listed above if they do not trust the identity server the user is supplying.
|
|
|
|
In order to allow client implementations to determine if the homeserver they are developed
|
|
against supports `id_server` being optional, an unstable feature flag of `m.require_identity_server`
|
|
is to be added to `/versions`. When the flag is `true` or not present, clients must assume
|
|
that the homeserver requires an `id_server` (ie: it has not yet considered it optional).
|
|
If this proposal is accepted, clients are expected to use the supported specification versions
|
|
the homeserver advertises instead of the feature flag's presence.
|
|
|
|
## Tradeoffs
|
|
|
|
Homeservers may have to set up MSISDN/email support to their implementations. This is believed
|
|
to be of minimal risk compared to allowing the identity server to continue being involved
|
|
with password reset/registration.
|
|
|
|
## Security considerations
|
|
|
|
The identity server was previously involved with affairs only the homeserver cares about.
|
|
This is no longer the case.
|